A few of the foregoing considerations render credence to the assertion you to definitely metaphor is actually a keen analogous identity. This is corroborated by St Thomas’ techniques at issue 13 out-of the brand new Prima Pars , once the when you look at the post three, as he requires or no name is said safely away from Goodness, the fresh resistance introduced to your enjoy was anywhere between utilize proprie and you may improprie to your latter recognized having metaphor. Following, for the blog post half a dozen, when he requires in the event the names popular in order to God and you will pets try earliest told you out-of animals, the newest huge difference proprie/improprie appears to be an excellent subdivision from analogous term. St Thomas starts from the stating that “inside the omnibus nominibus quae de- pluribus analogice dicuntur, necesse est quod omnia dicuntur for each and every respectum advertising unum: ainsi que ideo illud unum oportet quod ponatur from inside the definitione omnium. Ainsi que quia proportion quam significat nomen for each prius dicitur de- eo quod ponitur when you look at the definitione aliorum, mais aussi for every posterius de- aliis, secundum ordinem quo appropinquant post illud primum vel magis vel without.” This is exemplified of the old reputable, “suit.” “Sic thus omni nomina quae metaphorice de- Deo dicuntur for every single prius de- creaturis dicuntur quam de Deo: quia dicta de- Deo, nihil aliud high quam similitudines offer tales creaturas.” St. Thomas sees the similarity away from proportion ( similitudo proportionum ) suggested for the “smiling meadow” plus getting in touch with Jesus good lion.

As he goes on to speak off almost every other labels “quae non metaphorice dicuntur de- Deo,” the new obvious effect is the fact he is talking from almost every other instances from analogous brands than metaphors

Are there messages in which St Thomas opposes metaphor and you can example? When we consider the opinions towards the Metaphysics , we discover St Thomas distinguishing “potency” towards analogous and you may equivocal methods. “Potency” means unique. “Sed ista multiplicitas quantum advertising quosdam analogiae.” The equivocal methods out of efficiency is actually exemplified by-the-way i talk about step 3 for the 3rd fuel as well as the brand new cube because the fuel of your own range. “Ainsi que propter hoc for every single quamdam similitudinem dicitur potens into the quadratum, sicut dicitur materia potens within the rem” Once again an excellent proportionality see. That these equivocal methods are indeed metaphors is obvious from the synchronous passageway in-book Delta into the leaving comments about what St Thomas initiate, “Ostendit quomodo potentia sumatur metaphorice.” Why are these settings metaphorical rather than analogical? “Their thus modis praetermissis, considerandum est de- potentiis, quae reducuntur post unam speciem, quia quaelibet earum est principium quoddam, ainsi que omnes potentiae sic dictae reducantur ad aliquid principium ex lover quo omnes aliae dicuntur.” In short, St Thomas right here opposes metaphor so you can analogous spends from a name just like the second and not the previous include a reduction so you’re able to what’s mostly denominated of the word in question whereas, is to they you need citing, regarding text of your Summa i experienced the second in the past, the metaphor wasn’t popular on extension proprie on this basis. Or perhaps is it the way of mention of what is principally signifed of the identity and that differentiates metaphor of example, incorporate proprie out-of improprie book review essay writing services? One thing named metaphorically is, whatsoever, delivered to end up being like exactly what the name safely means.

What we would be finding is some technique for justifying the fresh pretty well-known variation from metaphor and analogy in a way that no interest is made to Cajetan’s department off example with the attribution and you will best proportionality

An enthusiastic aporia have certainly emerged, hence, as well as quality can only just become had from the deciding exactly what a metaphor was and you will just what a keen analogous name is. Methods to such issues is always to allow us to see the apparently contradictory statements regarding Aquinas.